How was the earth created ? There are 2 go to theories for this either creation or evolution.

Either the origin of things can be understood in terms of continuing natural process or we must resort to a supernatural process.I believe that creation is the only true justification for why man was created and should be the only explanation because all people are created on purpose for a purpose by god. Evolution is the scientific theory used by biologist. It’s how living things change over time and how they come to be the way they are. Most of people knowledge on evolution comes from a man named Charles Darwin.Charles Darwin, was an English naturalist, geologist and biologist.´´By the time of his death, Darwin had convinced most scientists that evolution is descent with modification was correct, and he was regarded as a great scientist who had revolutionised ideas. In June 1909, though few at that time agreed with his view that “natural selection has been the main but not the exclusive means of modification”, he was honoured by more than 400 officials and scientists from across the world´´>. His explanation made many people believe in his research at the time and today is still basically the alternate explanation for how Berry 02man was created. By definition if evolution was true then it would still be occurring today with plenty of evidence. Creation is the idea our universe and the natural things in it were created by God. God created the sky and the earth. At first, the earth was completely empty.

There was nothing on the earth. Darkness covered the ocean, and God’s Spirit moved over the water.(Genesis 1:1).In the bible the first word are basically saying that god has created everything.When you continue reading genesis it continues to tell you when all sorts of things were created. In 6 days god created light, animals,plants,and man. The 7th day was for rest.

In school we are taught early about evolution but not creation.This affects many people because of their religion. In 1968-2005 there has been plenty of court cases trying to figure out if creation or evolution is appropriate. For example ,In 1968, in Epperson v. Arkansas, the Supreme Court invalidated an Arkansas statute that prohibited the teaching of evolution. The Court held the statute unconstitutional on the grounds that the First Amendment to the U.

S. Constitution does not permit a state to require that teaching and learning must be tailored to the principles or prohibitions of any particular religious sect or doctrine. . To sum it up this court case stated that the teaching of evolution were unconstitutional because it affects the first amendment.  Berry 03There are only two possible basic models of origins, origin of the universe, of the earth, of life, of human life, and of the basic systems of the cosmos. These are, in simplest terms, evolution or creation. Either the origin of things can be understood in terms of continuing natural processes, or they cannot–one or the other.

If they cannot, then we must resort to completed supernatural processes to explain the origin of at least the basic symptoms of the cosmos. Evolution and creation thus exhaust the possibilities, as far as origins are concerned.  >This  means that if we can find either model of origins fake , then the other must be true. There is no other option.If there is anything certain in this world, however, it is that there is no evidence whatever that evolution is occurring today–that is, true vertical evolution, from some simpler kind to a more complex kind. No one has ever observed a star evolve from hydrogen, life evolve from chemicals, a higher species evolve from a lower species, a man from an ape, or anything else of this sort. Not only has no one ever observed true evolution in action, no one knows how evolution works, or even how it might work.

Since no one has ever seen it happen, and no one yet has come up with a workable mechanism to explain it, it would seem that it has been falsified, at least as far as the present world is concerned. This does not prove it did not happen in the past, of course, but the evolutionist should recognize that this means it is not science, since it is not observable. Evolution must be accepted on faith>.Berry 04 But how about prehistoric changes? The only real records we have are found in the sedimentary rocks of the earth’s crust, where fossil remains of formerly living creatures have been preserved for our observation, but the story is one of extinction, not evolution.

Many extinct animals are found but never, in all of these billions of fossils is a transitional form found. No fossil has ever been found with half scales/half feathers or half legs/half wings. Meaning that animals have not evolved from any other animals like darwin has suggested.If evolution were true, there should be millions of transitional types of fossils .

If one were to rely strictly on the observed evidence, he would have to agree that past evolution has also been falsified.Time is measurable. It is pure speculation to imagine that one can measure what one cannot detect. The Bible states that long-term events  are in our minds:”He has made everything appropriate in its time. He has also set eternity in their heart, yet so that man will not find out the work which God has done from the beginning even to the end”.(Ecclesiastes 3:11).Evidently time is a mental construct, not an objective entity.